The Challenge

The Climate-Extreme Evidence Gap

Wildfire, flood, drought, extreme heat, extreme wind and coastal exposure threaten communities, assets and economies — yet most decisions about them still run on fragmented information whose origin cannot be traced.

🌡️ Extremes touch every sector

Six interacting hazards — wildfire, flood, drought, extreme heat, extreme wind and coastal/sea exposure — affect population and settlements, agriculture, energy, transport, ports, industry, tourism and critical facilities alike.

  • No place is exposed to only one hazard
  • Exposure is population + infrastructure + business, together
  • Historical events shape today's decisions

🧩 Information is fragmented

The evidence exists — satellites, reanalysis archives, official registries, historical event records — but it is scattered across dozens of institutions, formats and access rules.

  • Different sources per hazard, per region, per variable
  • Coverage and freshness rarely stated where decisions are made
  • Historical evidence separated from current conditions

🏷️ Claims without provenance

Risk scores and loss figures circulate without source, method, resolution or uncertainty. Decision-makers cannot tell an observed fact from a modelled estimate or a projected scenario.

  • Observed mixed with modelled and projected
  • Uncertainty hidden instead of stated
  • "Unknown" treated as a failure instead of an answer

⏱️ Intelligence stops at the website

Even good analysis decays: conditions change after the user closes the tab. Without monitoring and alerts, nobody notices when a place they care about crosses into danger.

  • One-off checks instead of continuous watching
  • Warnings that never reach the responsible person
  • No traceable link from alert back to evidence

Decisions are only as good as their evidence

A municipality planning defences, an insurer pricing exposure, an investor screening assets, a farmer choosing crops — all ask the same questions: what is happening, what happened before, who and what is exposed, what does it mean economically, what can be done? Each answer must say what it rests on.

6 Hazards, one evidence base
6+5 Claim statuses + temporal classes on every result
100% Of results carry source & provenance
0 Invented numbers

Our answer

Talaix closes the evidence gap — Climate Extreme Intelligence from real data, honestly labelled.